<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: QuarkXPress 6.5:  Revolutionary&#8230; Or Desperate?</title>
	<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2004/quarkxpress-65-revolutionary-or-desperate/</link>
	<description>The Authority for News &#038; Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Quark VS InDesign &#187; First Look At QuarkXPress 7</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2004/quarkxpress-65-revolutionary-or-desperate/#comment-596</link>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jul 2005 19:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/features/2004/quarkxpress-65-revolutionary-or-desperate/#comment-596</guid>
					<description>[...] QuarkXPress 7, as first reported by Quark VS InDesign, is slated to ship summer 2005, though Drake would only confirm a release date of &#8220;this year.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] QuarkXPress 7, as first reported by Quark VS InDesign, is slated to ship summer 2005, though Drake would only confirm a release date of &#8220;this year.&#8221; [&#8230;]
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

