<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Release: QuarkXPress 7 clear winner among leading page layout applications</title>
	<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/</link>
	<description>The Authority for News &#038; Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:46:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: woz</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16840</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Oct 2006 14:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16840</guid>
					<description>Yeah, tice as fast. I suppose none of those guys needed to use a simple text-wrap in their cool composition zones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, tice as fast. I suppose none of those guys needed to use a simple text-wrap in their cool composition zones.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Peter</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16833</link>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 20:42:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16833</guid>
					<description>@hunter: Yeah, sure, a Seybold Report writer would do this... WAKE UP!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@hunter: Yeah, sure, a Seybold Report writer would do this&#8230; WAKE UP!
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Slapster</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16819</link>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 21:23:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16819</guid>
					<description>Interesting, I know a Production Manager at an international ad agency who was looking to hire a paid intern. They could only find &lt;em&gt;one&lt;/em&gt; person capable of using Quark, all the other applicants were taught, in design schools no less, InDesign only.

Quark: When the Truth hurts too much to accept, buy stock in blinders.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting, I know a Production Manager at an international ad agency who was looking to hire a paid intern. They could only find <em>one</em> person capable of using Quark, all the other applicants were taught, in design schools no less, InDesign only.</p>
<p>Quark: When the Truth hurts too much to accept, buy stock in blinders.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: hunter</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16818</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 11:51:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2006/press-release-quarkxpress-7-clear-winner-among-leading-page-layout-applications/#comment-16818</guid>
					<description>Sounds suspiciously like one of Microsoft's PR campaigns where they use "independent sources" to confirm that their OS is by far the best. Then when someone does some digging, they find that the independent sources are not so independent after all. The PR world has a term for it. It's called "grassroots campaigning".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds suspiciously like one of Microsoft&#8217;s PR campaigns where they use &#8220;independent sources&#8221; to confirm that their OS is by far the best. Then when someone does some digging, they find that the independent sources are not so independent after all. The PR world has a term for it. It&#8217;s called &#8220;grassroots campaigning&#8221;.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

