<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.11" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quark XPert Tools Pro Xtensions&#8212;Free!</title>
	<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/</link>
	<description>The Authority for News &#038; Opinion on the War of the Desktop Publishing Giants QuarkXPress and Adobe InDesign</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 02:27:59 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.0.11</generator>

	<item>
		<title>by: Pariah S. Burke</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19430</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 23:50:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19430</guid>
					<description>I agree with Tami. Saying "if you can’t do it without [xtensions or plug-ins], you gotta wonder if you should do it at all" is short-sighted. No matter how much an application developer invests in R&#038;D, no matter how often they talk to the market, they simply can't anticipate every need. Every major application has third-party developers extending or enhancing the applications. QuarkXPress, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, DreamWeaver, Flash, AfterEffects, FileMaker, Word, Excel, Outlook, Corel, FireFox, Internet Explorer... The list of applications that are built to accept, and for which have been developed, feature-extending plug-ins (etc.) goes on and on. In fact, major workflow solutions are based on third-party plug-ins. Both InDesign and QuarkXPress are at the heart of such systems that address workflow-specific needs far more accurately than Adobe or Quark could do directly in their applications.

For the consumer, the idea of, and the ability of the applications to use, third-party add-ins means applications that are infinitely extendable. Because add-ins are typically made by smaller companies or even individuals, development expenses are smaller and can be justified by smaller returns. For instance, a major application developer may call a product a failure if it sells less than ten thousand copies. A small plug-in developer, however, could consider a plug-in a commercial success after only a few hundred sales. And that means that more, and more specialized, add-ins can be created to address different needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Tami. Saying &#8220;if you can’t do it without [xtensions or plug-ins], you gotta wonder if you should do it at all&#8221; is short-sighted. No matter how much an application developer invests in R&#038;D, no matter how often they talk to the market, they simply can&#8217;t anticipate every need. Every major application has third-party developers extending or enhancing the applications. QuarkXPress, InDesign, Illustrator, Photoshop, DreamWeaver, Flash, AfterEffects, FileMaker, Word, Excel, Outlook, Corel, FireFox, Internet Explorer&#8230; The list of applications that are built to accept, and for which have been developed, feature-extending plug-ins (etc.) goes on and on. In fact, major workflow solutions are based on third-party plug-ins. Both InDesign and QuarkXPress are at the heart of such systems that address workflow-specific needs far more accurately than Adobe or Quark could do directly in their applications.</p>
<p>For the consumer, the idea of, and the ability of the applications to use, third-party add-ins means applications that are infinitely extendable. Because add-ins are typically made by smaller companies or even individuals, development expenses are smaller and can be justified by smaller returns. For instance, a major application developer may call a product a failure if it sells less than ten thousand copies. A small plug-in developer, however, could consider a plug-in a commercial success after only a few hundred sales. And that means that more, and more specialized, add-ins can be created to address different needs.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Tami</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19393</link>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19393</guid>
					<description>Everyone who purchases InDesign or Quark is using XTensions/plug-ins that install with the application. When Quark purchased ALAP, InDesign users were some of the first to oppose the loss of Imposer and other ALAP products for InDesign. It's not that XTensions fill a void that Quark leaves. It's that no application can be all things to all people...some of the most popular XTs are products that boast capabilities that neither Quark nor InDesign possess. They expedite repetitive tasks, automate specific workflows, etc. Alot of the developers write for both camps, knowing that certain production challenges (such as catalog production, book production, converting a Quark doc to InDesign and InDesign to Quark, etc) can be automated and save users time and money...and isn't that what we all are looking for? Some of the developers even do utilities with one or two functions and provide them for free for both applications. Having been working with XTensions since the days of 3.0, I'm here to say that many a user of both Quark and InDesign doing nothing but gain from these products.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Everyone who purchases InDesign or Quark is using XTensions/plug-ins that install with the application. When Quark purchased ALAP, InDesign users were some of the first to oppose the loss of Imposer and other ALAP products for InDesign. It&#8217;s not that XTensions fill a void that Quark leaves. It&#8217;s that no application can be all things to all people&#8230;some of the most popular XTs are products that boast capabilities that neither Quark nor InDesign possess. They expedite repetitive tasks, automate specific workflows, etc. Alot of the developers write for both camps, knowing that certain production challenges (such as catalog production, book production, converting a Quark doc to InDesign and InDesign to Quark, etc) can be automated and save users time and money&#8230;and isn&#8217;t that what we all are looking for? Some of the developers even do utilities with one or two functions and provide them for free for both applications. Having been working with XTensions since the days of 3.0, I&#8217;m here to say that many a user of both Quark and InDesign doing nothing but gain from these products.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: tuffy</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19273</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19273</guid>
					<description>Quark xensions are like marital aids - if you can't do it without them, you gotta wonder if you should do it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quark xensions are like marital aids - if you can&#8217;t do it without them, you gotta wonder if you should do it at all.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Joe Jitso</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19272</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19272</guid>
					<description>Wow free extensions that are already a part of Quark! Just what we didn't need. Why not make this POS work like it did in the day instead of giving away window dressing?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow free extensions that are already a part of Quark! Just what we didn&#8217;t need. Why not make this POS work like it did in the day instead of giving away window dressing?
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: The Slapster</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19271</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 20:27:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19271</guid>
					<description>I'm sure it has &lt;em&gt;nothing&lt;/em&gt; to do with the impending release of CS3 later this month. "Here, take some free XTensions to distract you from a better application, please!"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure it has <em>nothing</em> to do with the impending release of CS3 later this month. &#8220;Here, take some free XTensions to distract you from a better application, please!&#8221;
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
	<item>
		<title>by: Shellie Hall</title>
		<link>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19268</link>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Mar 2007 18:55:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://quarkvsindesign.com/articles/a1/news/2007/quark-xpert-tools-pro-xtensions-free/#comment-19268</guid>
					<description>This is a wonderful group of XT's - which we are giving away for free - which is a great value add to QXP7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a wonderful group of XT&#8217;s - which we are giving away for free - which is a great value add to QXP7.
</p>
]]></content:encoded>
				</item>
</channel>
</rss>

